US Attorney General Orders Grand Jury Hearings on Trump-Russia Problem

Federal Prosecutors Directed to Examine Trump-Russia Investigation Claims

Washington, D.C. - Attorney General Pam Bondi has authorized federal prosecutors to convene a grand jury investigation into allegations surrounding what Trump supporters call the "Russiagate conspiracy." The move comes following a criminal referral from Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard regarding the origins of the Trump-Russia investigation.

Bondi Orders Federal Prosecutor to Present Evidence to Grand Jury

Bondi personally directed an unnamed federal prosecutor to initiate legal proceedings, with the prosecutor expected to present evidence to a grand jury seeking potential indictments. The investigation stems from allegations that the Trump-Russia probe was politically motivated and constituted a conspiracy against the former president.

Gabbard's Criminal Referral Sparks Justice Department Action

Last month, DNI Gabbard released a declassified report accusing former President Barack Obama and his national security team of conducting what she termed a "years-long coup" against Trump. Gabbard alleged that intelligence regarding Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election was weaponized by the Obama administration to falsely connect Trump to Russia.

The intelligence director's findings prompted strong reactions from both sides of the political aisle. Trump responded by accusing Obama of "treason," while an Obama spokesperson dismissed the claims as "bizarre."

Democratic Opposition and Intelligence Community Findings

Democratic officials have disputed Gabbard's conclusions, maintaining that her report does not invalidate the January 2017 U.S. intelligence assessment that determined Russia attempted to damage Hillary Clinton's campaign while boosting Trump's electoral prospects.

A bipartisan 2020 Senate Intelligence Committee report similarly concluded that Russia actively worked to assist Trump's 2016 presidential campaign. These findings have created ongoing political tensions regarding the legitimacy of the original Trump-Russia investigation.

Potential Targets of Federal Investigation Remain Unclear

While specific charges and targets have not been publicly disclosed, media reports suggest that former CIA Director John Brennan and former FBI Director James Comey may face scrutiny related to their roles in the Trump-Russia probe. Both officials have consistently denied any wrongdoing and have accused Trump of attempting to weaponize the justice system.

A Department of Justice spokesperson declined to comment on the investigation but confirmed that Bondi is treating Gabbard's referral "very seriously," noting "clear cause for deep concern" and the need for further action.

Historical Context: Mueller Investigation and Its Aftermath

The original Trump-Russia investigation dominated much of Trump's first presidency, with Special Counsel Robert Mueller ultimately finding no evidence of criminal conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia. Despite the extensive probe, no individuals were charged with election-related coordination crimes.

Grand Jury Process and Next Steps

The grand jury process will determine whether sufficient evidence exists to file formal criminal charges. Grand juries consist of citizens who review evidence presented by prosecutors to decide if indictments should be issued. The timeline for this investigation remains uncertain.

Political Implications for Second Trump Administration

This development represents a significant escalation in the Trump administration's efforts to investigate what they characterize as the politicization of intelligence agencies during the Obama era. The investigation could have far-reaching implications for former intelligence officials and the broader intelligence community.

The Justice Department's decision to pursue this matter through grand jury proceedings signals the administration's commitment to examining allegations of misconduct in the origins of the Trump-Russia investigation, marking a notable reversal from previous DOJ positions on these matters.

---

last updated - 2025/08/05